On Party Technology: People on Inflatable Pool Floats Can Do Without a Captain

Dear Felienne! You won’t believe it. After ignoring your homework assignments and going off course week after week, I have done the work you assigned for this final episode of season one! And this time, I also managed to keep it shorter! So, here it comes… Adapting Life to LLMs Part one of the assignment was to read the paper ”Do Artifacts Have Politics?” (1980) by Langdon Winner1, which I did (well, to be honest, I read parts of it properly and skimmed other parts). I loved the following quote: ...

Why I Am Not a Scientist: Subjective Views on Objectivity, Truth and Computer Science

Dear Felienne! “What is your favorite flower?” — You asked me this question at the beginning of our podcast episode on Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison’s book “Objectivity” (2021), and we then…

Why I Am Not a Luddite: Confessions, Capitalism and Choosing Words Over Deeds

Dear Felienne! I need to start with a confession: I have a secret history of breaking things at work. My destructive streak started early, at primary school, when I destroyed the blackboard just after turning seven. Ok, maybe “destroyed” is a bit of an overstatement, but somehow I thought it would be funny to coat the entire blackboard with a layer of hand soap so the teacher’s chalk would no longer write on it. (I spent the entire weekend cleaning the board with the help of my mother; but yes, the other kids had fun.) Also later, while doing my first internships and when finally working ‘for real’, I quickly became known as the one who causes software to crash, drops her phone repeatedly, and ruins her new laptop on day one. ...

An Ode to Killed Darlings

Dear Felienne! I have written, deleted, and rewritten the start of this homework at least twenty times. I am on vacation; part of my brain is switched off, and today I just don’t have it in me to come up with a good, catchy opener that will draw our readers in. So let me just cut right to the chase… Modeling How People Think In our last episode of Computer Science Off Course, we discussed Sherry Turkle’s book “The Second Self”.1 I have now read chapter 7, “The New Philosophers of Artificial Intelligence”, and there is this one section that stuck out to me and got me thinking. This section describes an approach to modeling human thinking, developed by early AI scientists Herbert Simon and Allen Newell. They had this idea that to arrive at a computer model of people’s thinking, one could observe people as they solve a particular problem. For instance, they observed people solving cryptarithmetic puzzles, in which digits are replaced by letters in a math equation. People were asked to talk while they solved such problems, and the researchers recorded what the participants did, what they said, and their eye movements. Subsequently, they analyzed these rich data. From these data, the different procedures and strategies people used to solve the puzzles in question could be distilled and turned into programs that simulate them. Since not all people solve problems in the same way, different programs would be developed for each type of problem. However, Herbert Simon and Allen Newell held the idea that all these different individual programs would still ”have the same general form” (p. 225) and that this general form characterizes ”how people think” (p. 225). ...

Dear ELIZA, I need your help!

HOW DO YOU DO. PLEASE TELL ME YOUR PROBLEM? Thanks for asking! The truth is: It’s not going great. Usually, I would talk to my colleague and friend Felienne. But this time, I believe it is better to share my thoughts with you, ELIZA, the original chatbot. I know you have officially retired, and that your nephews Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini have taken over your duties of chatting with people about their well-being and mental health. But dear ELIZA, I really need your help! ...